A decade after Sandpoint, Idaho, eliminated parking minimums in its downtown area, the city has witnessed a remarkable transformation. This policy change, initially met with skepticism, has spurred millions in investments and revitalized the urban core, proving the value of flexible zoning practices.
The move to abolish parking minimums came in 2009, following observations that such regulations were hindering productive land use. A notable example was a bank that demolished adjacent buildings for parking it didn't need, highlighting the absurdity of rigid requirements. By simply altering one line in the city's code, Sandpoint opened the door to innovative land use and development.
The results have been undeniable. A tech startup's renovation of an old steel frame building increased the property's value by $2 million. Other successes include a new music venue, the expansion of a taqueria from a food truck, and a defunct furniture store's transformation into a winery showcase. These developments have boosted tax revenues, created jobs, and invigorated the local economy.
Encouraged by these outcomes, Sandpoint expanded the area exempt from parking minimums in 2018 and reduced requirements citywide. This approach has caught the attention of other cities, like Haltom City, Texas, where advocates are pushing for similar changes to rejuvenate older areas.
Aaron Qualls, Sandpoint's Planning and Community Development Director, emphasizes that none of these investments would have been possible under the old parking minimums. This sentiment is echoed by organizations like Strong Towns, which champions policy changes for financially resilient cities.
Sandpoint's experience underscores the potential of modest zoning adjustments to drive significant urban and economic development. As cities nationwide seek solutions to decline and vacancy, Sandpoint's success offers a compelling case for reevaluating parking policies and embracing more adaptable urban planning strategies.
